Try it
Microbiology · Virus detection: interference
Sample itemRubella virus from a throat swab is inoculated into African green monkey kidney cells, and no cytopathic effect appears. When ECHO 11 virus is added, the cells are also unaffected, whereas control cells without rubella show destruction. Which phenomenon allows rubella detection here?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
C. Viral interference
Rubella virus often grows without cytopathic effect, but cells infected with it resist superinfection by a challenge virus such as ECHO 11 because of interference. Protection against the challenge virus, therefore, shows indirectly that rubella is present. Interferon and receptor competition may mediate the effect.
Option by option
A. Complementation
Complementation involves one virus supplying a missing function to a defective virus.
B. Haemadsorption
Haemadsorption relies on red cells sticking to infected cells, not on resistance to a challenge virus.
C. Viral interference (correct)
Correct. Resistance to the challenge virus reveals the non-cytopathic virus.
D. Phenotypic mixing
Phenotypic mixing involves envelope or capsid swapping in dual infection.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More Microbiology questions
- BacteriologyA patient has profuse painless watery 'rice-water' stools and rapid dehydration. The cau…
- Culture mediaThayer–Martin medium is used selectively to isolate which organism?
- Immunology and serologyWhich of the following is a non-treponemal test for syphilis?
- BacteriologyAlbert's stain is used to demonstrate which of the following?