Try it
PSM · Epidemiology
Sample itemWhich study design is the most efficient for investigating risk factors of a rare disease?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
A. Case-control study
Case-control studies start with cases and compare past exposures with matched controls, which is quick and cheap for rare outcomes. Cohort studies would need huge numbers to see enough events.
Option by option
A. Case-control study (correct)
Correct.
B. Cross-sectional study
A cross-sectional study would capture too few cases.
C. Randomised controlled trial
An RCT is for testing interventions, and would be impractical here.
D. Cohort study
A cohort would need very large follow-up to capture a rare outcome.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More PSM questions
- EpidemiologyIf the basic reproduction number (R0) of an infection is 4, roughly what proportion of t…
- EpidemiologyIn which study design is the odds ratio the appropriate measure of association?
- EpidemiologyIn a study, mothers of children with congenital anomalies recall drugs taken in pregnanc…
- EpidemiologyAfter a wedding feast, many guests develop gastroenteritis within a few hours of each ot…