Try it
PSM · Epidemiology: ecological fallacy
Sample itemUsing district-level data, an analyst finds that districts with higher average sale of packaged snacks have higher rates of childhood obesity, and concludes that children who eat these snacks become obese. Which error is this conclusion most likely to involve?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
D. Ecological fallacy
In an ecological study the unit of analysis is a group, so an association at group level may not hold for individuals. Inferring individual-level causation from aggregate data is the ecological fallacy. The same districts may differ in income, urbanisation and activity levels, and the snack eaters need not be the obese children.
Option by option
A. Recall bias
Recall bias occurs when cases and controls remember past exposures differently, which is not relevant to aggregate data.
B. Lead-time bias
Lead-time bias applies to screening, where earlier diagnosis seems to lengthen survival.
C. Berkson's bias
Berkson's bias arises when hospital-based cases and controls have different admission rates.
D. Ecological fallacy (correct)
Correct. Group-level correlation has been wrongly applied to individual children.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More PSM questions
- Epidemiology: ecological fallacyA study of 40 countries finds a strong positive correlation between national average sal…
- BiostatisticsOf 200 people who truly have a disease, a screening test is positive in 180. What is the…
- Environmental healthAfter one hour of contact time, what residual free chlorine level is generally recommend…
- EpidemiologyWhich study design is the most efficient for investigating risk factors of a rare disease?