Try it
Dentistry · Dental materials and radiology basics: cobalt-chromium denture framework
Sample itemWhy is cobalt-chromium preferred to type IV gold for a removable partial denture framework?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
A. Its high modulus allows thin, rigid, light connectors
Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys have a high modulus of elasticity, so a thin section is still rigid, and they are less dense than gold alloys, so the framework is lighter and cheaper. Their drawbacks are hardness, which makes finishing harder, and low ductility, which makes clasp adjustment difficult.
Option by option
A. Its high modulus allows thin, rigid, light connectors (correct)
Correct. High stiffness permits thin, rigid and light connectors.
B. Its low hardness makes finishing quicker and easier
It is considerably harder than gold and is more difficult to finish and polish.
C. Its high density gives better stability on the ridge
It is less dense than gold, so a framework is lighter, not heavier.
D. Its greater ductility makes clasp adjustment much easier
Cobalt-chromium is less ductile than gold, so clasps are harder to adjust.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More Dentistry questions
- Tooth development: Hertwig's root sheathDuring tooth development, which structure induces odontoblast differentiation in the roo…
- Tooth eruption: first permanent toothA 6-year-old child has a new tooth behind the last deciduous molar, with no deciduous to…
- Tooth development: neonatal lineGround sections of deciduous teeth show an accentuated incremental line in enamel and de…
- Tooth development: cell rests of MalassezEpithelial cell rests of Malassez persist in the periodontal ligament. Which cyst most o…