Try it
PSM · Epidemiology: effect modification
Sample itemIn a cohort, the crude relative risk of lung cancer with smoking is 3.0. Stratified by asbestos exposure, the relative risks are 10 in the exposed and 1.2 in the unexposed. Which phenomenon explains this?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
B. Effect modification
When the strength of an association differs across strata of a third variable, that variable is an effect modifier, and stratum-specific estimates should be reported separately. In confounding the stratum-specific estimates are similar and differ from the crude one. Effect modification is a real biological interaction, not a bias.
Option by option
A. Confounding
Confounding would give similar stratum-specific values that differ from the crude value.
B. Effect modification (correct)
Correct. Stratum-specific estimates differ markedly, so asbestos modifies the effect.
C. Information bias
Information bias comes from errors in measuring exposure or outcome.
D. Selection bias
Selection bias arises from how subjects enter the study, not from stratified results.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More PSM questions
- BiostatisticsOf 200 people who truly have a disease, a screening test is positive in 180. What is the…
- Environmental healthAfter one hour of contact time, what residual free chlorine level is generally recommend…
- EpidemiologyWhich study design is the most efficient for investigating risk factors of a rare disease?
- BiostatisticsIn hypothesis testing, a Type I error is: