Try it
PSM · Environmental health: Clostridium perfringens as an indicator
Sample itemA water sample grows spores of Clostridium perfringens but no E. coli. How should the result be interpreted?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
C. Remote or past faecal contamination
E. coli indicates recent faecal pollution because it survives only a short time outside the gut. Clostridium perfringens spores persist for long periods, so their presence without E. coli suggests remote or intermittent contamination. Such water is still unsafe to assume potable.
Option by option
A. Recent fresh faecal contamination
Recent contamination would be indicated by E. coli.
B. Safe water because E. coli is absent
Absence of E. coli does not make water safe when spores indicate earlier faecal pollution.
C. Remote or past faecal contamination (correct)
Correct. Persistent spores point to past contamination.
D. Contamination only by industrial waste
Perfringens is a gut organism, not an industrial indicator.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More PSM questions
- BiostatisticsOf 200 people who truly have a disease, a screening test is positive in 180. What is the…
- Environmental healthAfter one hour of contact time, what residual free chlorine level is generally recommend…
- EpidemiologyWhich study design is the most efficient for investigating risk factors of a rare disease?
- BiostatisticsIn hypothesis testing, a Type I error is: